Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Gillis's avatar

As a long time photographer I have rarely used the autofocus on my DSLRs, preferring to manually focus my lenses. None of my film cameras have ever had autofocus. Early autofocus seemed like a solution in search of a problem to me since it worked best in bright light when focusing manually was easy and fell down in low light when it could have been useful. Things have improved in that regard, but old habits die hard. All of my commercial work happens in a studio with flash, so auto exposure isn't something I use either--my trusty Sekonic L 718 tells me what the exposure will be since none of my cameras will communicate with my White Lightning X series strobes. If I shot sports for a living I'm sure I would feel differently.

As for the equipment treadmill, my newest digital camera came out in 2016. It makes great images and I see no reason to upgrade. I learned long ago that equipment has to be good enough and feel right in the hands, and that newer isn't always better. The newest film camera that I regularly use is a Nikon SP that came out in 1957. Film is basically a hobby at this point, and I enjoy using the older rangefinder cameras and lenses that I have collected over the last 12 years.

Ken Smith's avatar

While I agree with your perspective on unnecessary bells and whistles, I disagree with your dismissal of autofocus as unnecessary. Having your subject or point of interest in sharp focus is essential to making a meaningful photo, and I'm glad my camera *usually* takes care of this aspect with no problem and allows me to "focus" on other elements such as light, composition, and mood. I bought one of Minolta's early autofocus film cameras back in the 90s and it instantly improved the quality of my photos, especially when I started enlarging and selling them.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?