Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jim Spitler's avatar

I love the "short summary". Simplicity is very close to the 5 C's of cinematography, "Filmmakers" using film always considered Discernment and Economy, we had to or fail financially. Limitations...are really good as a part of the self editing process that makes us all better image makers. With 16mm and 35mm there could never be a botched roll, it was just too costly (even 50 years ago). Your short summary is a very good guide for the digital world. With digital we can experiment at a lower cost, but to become really good one must remain disciplined in focus, framing, composition, light and exposure. Shooting a few rolls of film every once and a while is a great way to learn or relearn some visual discipline.

Bruce Stowell's avatar

I’ve been taking pictures for most of my 77 years. Not for money, my day job was too stressful. Making a print was part of the film process. Digital has the nasty aspect of always being viewed and shared on a screen.

Over the last 15 years I have been printing more. I refer to it as “Have and Hold”. Relatives get prints with text on the back. Street or bar pictures I return with 5X7s a couple of days later. Most people who work for me get informal portrait at the end of the day.

So I have returned to printing being the end step of taking a picture. To save money they get 4X6, but more often 5X7.

Printing sharpens my attention. Forces me to account. People pay attention to something they can hold in their hands.

An iPhone or iPad or computer does not cut it.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?