Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bruce M. Herman's avatar

I’ve been using C1 since I purchased a Fujifilm GFX100 S several years ago. Like you, I have maintained my subscriptions to PS/LRC for various reasons, mostly to have a pixel based editor. I moved to C1 because I felt it did a better job with color, particularly the Fujifilm film curves (like the color profiles in LRC’s Develop) than either LRC or DxO. That remains the case at least for my eyes. I’ll admit that with some extra work, I can achieve the same color in the competing RAW processing software, but I prefer to spend my time in other ways.

FWIW, I also like the use of layers in C1, and I think it does a better job with masks. DxO has vastly better lens calibrations than either C1 or Adobe.

I DO NOT appreciate the arrogance of C1’s customer support staff. I’ve made suggestions for several enhancements to C1 that received widespread support from other users only to be told that the developers have other priorities. That’s not an uncommon response to user suggestions. I’ve stopped making suggestions. The company is almost exclusively focused on portrait and studio photography. It’s still the best product for my approach to RAW editing, but I wouldn’t be a good source for a glowing product recommendation.

donna's avatar

😆I never had Capture1, so I don’t miss it, and I’m sure I don’t need all of it, but can’t give up, my much loved all access Adobe subscription. But you just completely talked me into a new iPad. Here I was thinking my iPhone and Mac desktop were enough! Silly me.

No posts

Ready for more?